Get the latest updates on state EVV mandates.

Ohio Providers Struggle to Find Approved Alternative Vendor

Ohio has a contract with Sandata to provide a state-wide EVV solution, beginning January 8, 2018. The state claims providers can use their own vendor instead of Sandata, but some providers are finding it difficult to get alternative vendors approved.

Only services provided through the fee-for-service Medicaid program are included. Services reimbursed through a managed care plan are not part of the EVV program at this time.

Programs Affected: State Plan Home Health Aide, State Plan Home Health Nursing, Private Duty Nursing (PDN), Ohio Home Care Waiver Nursing, Ohio Home Care Waiver Personal Care Aide, Home Care Attendant, and RN Assessment

Indiana to Implement Aggregator System

Indiana has enlisted DCX Technology to design an EVV system for implementation effective January 1, 2019. Providers may use another system to EVV, since the one DCX is creating will aggregate data from other systems. If providers choose to use another system, it must document the following (as written in an IHCP bulletin):

  • Type of service performed
  • Individual receiving the service
  • Date of service
  • Location of service delivery
  • Individual providing the service
  • Time the service begins and ends

Indiana has not yet released training material for the new EVV system.

Programs Affected: Personal care services

Minnesota DHS Recommends Hybrid Implementation Model

The Minnesota Department of Human Services published a lengthy legislative report detailing the state’s considerations on EVV. In this report, DHS recommends the hybrid model, in which the state purchases an EVV system that any provider may use but also allows providers to choose an alternative system that meets requirements.

Florida Has State Contract for EVV, But Allows Third-Party Integration

The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration has a contract with Centric Consulting, LLC to provide an EVV system to fee-for-service providers. Centric’s EVV solution is called Tellus EVV. Training materials are available online.

Providers using a different EVV system may continue to use it if the system integrates with Tellus and meets state requirements.

Programs Affected: Home health services (home health visits, private duty nursing and personal care services)

Several States Yet to Publicly Confirm Implementation Models

CMS guidelines indicate that Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, South Carolina, and Washington have chosen to mandate a statewide external vendor for EVV, but the states have not publicly confirmed this.

CMS indicated the Maryland has chosen to mandate a statewide in-house vendor, but the state has not publicly confirmed this.

CMS indicated that Massachusetts has chosen to mandate a statewide in-house model or an open vendor model, but the state has not publicly confirmed either of these.

CMS indicated that New Jersey has chosen to use an MCP choice or open vendor model, but the state has not publicly confirmed either of these.

CMS indicated that New Mexico has chosen to use an MCP choice model, but the state has not publicly confirmed this.

CMS indicated that Alaska, New York, and Utah have chosen to use a provider choice model, but the states have not publicly confirmed this.